Score: 3.5 / 5
If there was any major filmmaker out there who decided a remake of The Witches should happen and who had the technical, deeply disturbing, and contagious sense of fun required for it, it would be Robert Zemeckis. His varied and always surprising filmography often marries the fantastic to the macabre, the uncanny to the fetishistic, and his control of the slim boundary between the delightful and terrifying plays out best on the largest screen in town. Unfortunately, his newest vision was released in October, just as people were ready to celebrate holidays and COVID-19 was keeping things too dangerous to venture outside, and so it premiered on the rather exclusive streaming service HBO Max. Thank goodness for free trials!
To briefly summarize the plot, for the unfamiliar: A young unnamed boy, orphaned, moves in with his grandmother and casually runs into a witch. She immediately believes him and tells him about a secret society of witches, wicked fiends who look normal apart from their gloves, wigs, and squared shoes; these accoutrements disguise their monstrous appearance. But once a witch discovers a child, the child is perpetually in danger, and so the boy and his grandmother leave home to hide out at a nearby hotel. But soon after the Grand High Witch shows up there to lead a conference, unveiling their plan to use a potion -- hidden in candy around the world -- to turn children into mice. Before he can warn anyone else, the boy is caught and mouse-ified and spends the rest of the film trying to stay alive and thwart the witches.
It's a cute enough premise, but as with all adaptations of Roald Dahl's work, it requires certain understandings going in, or else viewers may become hopelessly frustrated. The 1983 novel has been previously adapted to film, in 1990 by Nicolas Roeg, and it has yet to be fully satisfying as a story. After a clever and interesting setup, some chilling exposition, and an early centerpiece that is camp heaven, the story peters out into odd chases, bewildering chance encounters, unfulfilled intrigue, and ultimately an ending that is so deeply uncomfortable that each movie has attempted to change it, unsuccessfully each time. Add to it the hotly debated misogyny and racism claims against Dahl's work and the whole concept becomes generally unpleasant.
Which is, surely, why Zemeckis assembled a team of stars to create this new version, even if the reasons for doing so are difficult to determine. Co-written by Guillermo del Toro, whose work with dark fantasy seems remarkably fitting here (and let's all take a minute to thank Hollywood for keeping Tim Burton away from this project), this movie transplants the plot from '80s England/Norway to '60s Alabama and makes the boy and his grandmother Black. There's more than a hint that this may be partly inspired by Lovecraft Country and the general social trauma of the past four years, especially when the grandmother, Agatha (played by Octavia Spencer doing what she does best), takes her grandson, named Charlie here, to a nearby hotel. Its large white façade feel reminiscent of a plantation, and grandmother's assertion that "witches only prey on the poor" feels a little too on-the-nose in these surroundings. When the well-dressed women arrive at the hotel's private ballroom for their meeting of the International Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, shifting from suffragettes to pro-life Republicans to something not unlike Nazis, and discuss turning children into mice to be "sqvashed", the allusions pile up faster than you can keep count.
But there is no denying the sheer watchability and enjoyability of this movie, and I look forward to seeing it again. Anne Hathaway goes for broke here, with a balls-out performance that often feels like it's in a different movie altogether. Much like Angelica Huston in the previous film, Hathaway is clearly having fun camping up her performance and giving so much energy that even when her face splits into a shark-toothed Glasgow smile you see her more than the layers of effects; her thickly ambiguous and theatrical accent tosses in rolling Norse "r" sounds to honor the source, but more than once I wondered if her vaguely eastern European voice was inspired by our own current first lady. "Be best," I wanted her to purr in the moments she wasn't screaming with diabolic ecstasy. She is brilliant even when others are overshadowed (Stanley Tucci), underserved by the script (at least Spencer gets to sing and dance to the oldies), or simply in a movie they just don't belong in (Kristin Chenoweth, I love you, but why are you voicing this mouse like a Southern belle?).
As with many Zemeckis films, he's less interested here in engaging in any Big Ideas. He all but ignores the potentially anti-Semitic theme of blood libel, despite making the witches even more human and therefore more evil than in Roeg's version, sidelines sexist conception of the witches themselves, and barely verbalizes any of the racial tension on screen that he himself created for this picture. Rather, he prefers letting these many issues exist visually, running rampant but small like the mice through his story that is ultimately meant to be funny, thrilling, and scary. Rather like Dahl's prose, in fact. Frankly I don't have a problem with that in itself, but I'd have liked to see Zemeckis and del Toro dramatically rework the story to make some kind of point. Not that a point is necessary, but the similarity of this flick to Roeg's thirty years ago does give me some consternation. They could have restructured the basic plot into anything, and frankly they both have more than enough imagination to do it.