Showing posts with label Roland Moller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roland Moller. Show all posts

Monday, September 27, 2021

Blood Red Sky (2021)

 Score: 2 / 5

Nadja is a single mother and fighting a debilitating illness that appears to be terminal. When we first see her, pale and bald in a restroom, she looks to be battling leukemia; she's a woman of few words, so we never fully get a glimpse of her inner life. A German widow, she's shuttling her son into a red-eye flight across the Atlantic to a doctor in New York who might be able to help her out. Her son, Elias, who can't be more than ten or twelve years old, gazes knowingly at her as though he has matured far beyond his years while seeing his only parent suffer. As we might expect, the flight is doomed: shortly after taking off, a group of terrorists kills the air marshals and pilot, hijacking the plane until their ransom is paid. Surely this will be a Flightplan meets Air Force One scenario, and show the triumph of family and guts over greed and ambition.

And yet, as the terror sets in amongst the passengers, we realize that Nadja is hiding something far more horrifying. Played by a very physical Peri Baumeister, Nadja undergoes a transformation, revealing herself to be a vampire on the rampage. Having taken a drug earlier to suppress her bloodlust and pallid, batlike appearance, the sudden violence on the plane brings out the worst in her. Literally. Almost immediately, she's draining corpses of their fluids, and the terrorists realize that they picked the wrong plane to hijack.

Blood Red Sky belongs to the genre-mixing, bizarro family of From Dusk till Dawn, Snakes on a PlaneCowboys vs. Aliens, or Train to Busan. Mash up two unlikely character types and see what happens, just for fun; throw in some schlocky gore and a few loud guffaws, and you've got a really fun time at the movies. Given the last decade or so, we've gotten to like antihero stories, and so watching a woman rip a bunch of white male terrorists up should be an exciting new prospect. It helps that she's a mother -- and a good one -- although her relationship with Elias takes far too much time to establish and develop. Is it necessary, to build what little we know of her character? Of course, but this sentimentality should support the ridiculous story rather than fight it for thematic dominance.

Then again, the chemistry between Baumeister and the little boy who plays Elias is one of the only things the movie gets totally right. Instead of making her vampiric revelation a fabulous midway centerpiece of the film, writer-director Peter Thorwarth makes it a fairly bland part of the expository setup. It would have been so fun to watch the terrorists make bloody discoveries and to learn with them, in horror, that the person killing their mercenaries isn't a hidden Harrison Ford or Jodie Foster, but rather a sharp-fanged, pointy-eared creature that looks like Stephen King's nightmares a la 'Salem's Lot.

Even with the hijacking, the movie takes a long time to pick up its own pace. Once Nadja goes full monster mode, complete with flashbacks to her initial infection and transformation, Thorwarth finds his intended pacing in close-quarters action. Unfortunately, the action is often fairly obvious; uninspired, these scenes take place in flourescent-lit cabins and holding decks. Movies cramped in claustrophobic spaces work best when individual scenes are in easily-differentiated locations, adding a sense of movement and momentum to the shots, even if the plot isn't advancing much. This movie can't quite escape what feels like visual doldrums, locking us into a bloodbath in which I cannot remember the sequence of events because of the lack of visual cues or development of unique sequences. It also doesn't help that the movie is longer than two hours. 

And speaking of time, the filmmakers almost completely sideline the easiest, most compelling part of pushing this plot! The simple fact that, due to the terrorists' rerouting of the plane, the sun might shine through at some point and destroy the only hope these passengers have. Beyond that, the film introduces ideas such as anti-Muslim fears, motherly sacrifice, and even the nature of the vampire in question, and only barely follows through on any of these interesting ideas, choosing instead to focus on the repetitive bloody action. I guess it was a fine enough distraction for a quiet night at home, but I certainly have no interest in taking this flight again.

Friday, January 11, 2019

Papillon (2018)

Score: 2.5 / 5

What a weird movie. It probably helped my appreciation for this film that I haven't seen the 1973 original -- or maybe not -- but I found it pleasantly diverting and endlessly frustrating, an altogether entertaining way to spend a mindless evening after work.

Papillon, so named for the butterfly tattoo on his chest, is a Parisian safecracker who is framed for murder and shipped off to a penal colony in French Guiana. It would seem that Papillon's innocence inspires him to endure, survive, and escape, but the problem with that: he's not innocent. Charlie Hunnam plays the character as a brutish thug with hopes for escape. There's no redemption for him, though his character is not necessarily a bad person. He immediately connects with a slim, awkward counterfeiter named Louis Dega, played by Rami Malek, though his initial reasoning is based on hearing that Dega is wealthy and connected. Protect him from the wolves, Papi knows, and he'll owe you later.

At this point, when traditionally the plot builds into adventure upon escape attempt upon grand violence, the film shifts into completely unexpected territory. True enough that the film is rather violent and even quite exciting, but I'd argue that the central point of the film is an unlikely romance between these two men. We're never shown anything erotic or flirtatious, but their striking intimacy is something at once disturbing and endearing. It's not wholly platonic, either, but complex due to their time, place, and incarceration. It's a sort of Beauty and the Beast tale, except that they're both prisoners, wherein they each endure hardship and suffering and separation but always manage to come back to each other.

Gorgeously shot and starring two strong lead performances, the film suffers considerably from a lack of compelling plot as well as any deep consideration of its weighty themes. We're tossed about from scene to scene, lengthy time passes in the blink of an eye, and what could (and probably should) have been a profound meditation on the souls of men in torment becomes an unwieldy adventure-drama that neither wallows in its torturous excesses nor leads to any transcendent sense of redemption or freedom or victory. In fact, the romance was so strong that by the end, I was begging Papi aloud not to leave sweet Dega alone on Devil's Island. (SPOILER ALERT) He did, and I was angry at him for it. That's not, I suspect, the filmmakers' intention.

It could have been a sort of Count of Monte Cristo-meets-Shawshank Redemption, and while I'm glad it's not terribly derivative, I can't help but wonder, "Why this movie, and why now?" The film does not offer any answers.

IMDb: Papillon