Showing posts with label Kathy Bates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kathy Bates. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 24, 2023

Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret. (2023)

Score: 4.5 / 5

Regretfully having never read Judy Blume's landmark source material, I went into this movie having no idea what to expect. My sole reasons were its casting -- and, admittedly, a curiosity about the title, the hype around which I never heard more than people praising it vaguely -- and so its story and ideas took me completely by surprise. And, really, maybe that was the best way to experience it. So if you know nothing or very little about Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret, I'd recommend you stop reading after this paragraph. Its early scenes piqued my interest, and before long I was laughing and weeping aloud in the crowded cinema alongside others of all ages doing pretty much the same thing. This is the kind of communal family drama that I'd recommend to everyone everywhere, especially for group viewings.

In case you don't know or need a refresher, the story is essentially a bildungsroman for young Margaret Simon, living in New Jersey in the 1970s. She has not been raised within any organized religion, having interfaith parents; her Jewish father and Christian mother want her to determine her own religious identity when she's older (at the start of the film, she's eleven, if my notes are to be trusted). Things reach a dramatic climax when her grandparents -- her emotionally and socially intimate Jewish paternal grandmother Sylvia as well as her estranged Christian maternal grandparents from the Midwest -- all arrive for spring break and clash catastrophically, each attempting to inculcate their religious practices. But Margaret isn't only beset by matters of faith, family, and culture: she's also a middle school girl suddenly transplanted from New York City to suburban New Jersey, navigating friendships and flirtations with peers whose bodies and hormones are changing by the day. She learns in rapid succession about everything from periods to bras, and wishes more than anything that she'd "grow up" as quickly as some of her classmates.

It's a beautiful story, rich in both complexity and nostalgia, frank but delicate in its forthright attention to the subject matter. Even in our jaded age, it says a lot about the source material and the filmmakers that not a single scene feels uncomfortable or out of place (to clarify, there are indeed some uncomfortable encounters in the plot, but even the difficult scenarios are handled with grace, understanding, and even some levity by the filmmakers). We never once doubt the sincerity of these characters, and that's incredibly rare these days, even in family-friendly comedies. That has a lot to do with Blume, surely, but here I'll praise writer and director Kelly Fremon Craig for her endlessly insightful and accessible work. I suspect, but admittedly don't know, that Craig's adaptation includes new material in her scenes dramatizing the inner life of Margaret's mother Barbara (played by a magnificent Rachel McAdams). Her character was the one I absolutely did not expect to take such a central role, and I was tearfully glad to be wrong.

Although the film is set in 1970 or so -- and its production design, costumes, and acting are all gobsmackingly pitch-perfect -- it spoke to me in surprising ways and made me feel nostalgic for my own childhood in the '90s. The neighborhood Margaret's family moves to is not dissimilar from where I grew up in western Michigan, and I remember a lot of similar conversations with friends (though naturally fewer talk of periods and bra sizes with my friend group of boys) on warm spring days of running through lawn sprinklers. We, too, had our not-quite-secret clubs and hideouts, learning tough lessons of honesty, trust, peer pressure, curiosity and its cost, and personal authenticity. Early on, Margaret meets her new friend's brother's friend, a neighborhood boy and hardworking lawn-mower nicknamed Moose, who has started growing hair under his arms; the camera shifts suddenly to Margaret's perspective as she notices it and realizes he's maturing in ways that are exciting to her rather than annoying. That seems a fairly universal moment of realization, and this film puts us right back in that mental state; we know her crush on Moose will take probably the whole film for her to process and accept, and indeed it does.

There are countless moments like this that combine earnestness with good-natured humor -- the girls attempting to exercise to grow breasts while chanting "I must, I must, I must increase my bust" is a pure delight -- that never once makes fun of the kids. It showcases how silly and cruel kids can be in their most raw and honest interactions, but never treats them exploitatively. It's a tightrope of tone, one that Craig handles with what would seem to be veteran mastery, though this is only her sophomore directorial work. Similarly, even when Margaret's parents or the other adults around her act in, shall we say, nearsighted ways, it's not out of malice or neglect so much as another form of earnestness, one that speaks to our understanding that these characters are all just trying to learn, do right, and be well in harmony with each other. It's an overwhelmingly refreshing view of adulthood and humanity that I did not expect and haven't seen on screen in some time.

Rachel McAdams, as I said, is magnificent in this film. Benny Safdie capably plays her husband, Herb, but the movie belongs solely to McAdams and the utterly brilliant titular protagonist, played by Abby Ryder Forston, who deserves awards for this performance. I've said Forston is one of the best working child actors since I first saw her in 2014 (Transparent, The Whispers, and of course the first two Ant-Man films), and she is absolutely making a big name for herself as a young woman now. Yet for all this, I was most surprised and delighted by the presence of Kathy Bates in this film as Herb's mother Sylvia. Bates's always reliable and reliably brilliant talents are here heightened to full scene-chewing panache in a character almost tailored to her skill set, though of course she clearly works hard for spontaneity and vivacity in every moment.

With an unexpectedly sharp focus on the three generations of women (paternal grandmother, mother, and daughter), a curious theme emerges that doesn't fit the mold of bildungsroman but informs it in fascinating ways: that of how one's parenting behaviors affect the development and identity of their children. I suppose we saw some similar things in Boyhood, too, though that narrative was worlds away from this. Barbara is just as much a fish out of water as Margaret, dramatized handily in scenes that depict her giving up her art teaching career to become a suburban housewife and school mom run ragged by the PTA. There's some of this, too, with Sylvia (who I think is widowed, but could also be divorced or a staunch Auntie Mame type woman, I'm not sure if the film tells us) clearly devastated when her son and granddaughter move out of the city. Their relationship certainly isn't that of a helicopter or have any shades of codependency, but she struggles with her purpose and aim without her family nearby, and that's something all three women will need to navigate moving forward.

It's an amazing film altogether, full stop. I found myself wondering often what might happen if we had slightly more access to the characters' internal lives, specifically their opinions about each other. Their mutual love is palpable, certainly, and the actors clearly have lots of strong reactions and feelings about various events, but I'd have liked just a bit more open dialogue between them at crucial moments, such as when Margaret's best friend gets her first period and her mother reacts stiffly and awkwardly, or how Margaret must feel about Barbara's attempted reconciliation with her apparently anti-Semitic parents. Then again, these brief but significant moments of mystery will be the things that keep me coming back to this film in thought and during re-watches, so maybe they're important as they are.

Monday, December 23, 2019

Richard Jewell (2019)

Score: 3.5 / 5

Atlanta, 1996. The Georgia summer heat isn't bothering the thousands of people who descended on the Olympic games and assorted festivities. During one concert at Centennial Park, a pipe bomb explodes, killing two people and injuring a hundred more. A frantic hunt for the bomber begins, but a clear suspect takes center stage: Richard Jewell, the security guard who found the bomb.

But Richard Jewell doesn't begin here. The introduction to this film starts earlier, following its protagonist through a bustling office where he works as a custodian. Shortly after, we see that he has become a security guard at a college. His tough work ethic doesn't always jive with his coworkers or the people he serves; he is mocked for being overweight and for having lofty ambitions (he considers himself law enforcement, on par with police officers). He is fired after multiple complaints from students of him overstepping boundaries and abusing the power of his position; he views this as him going above and beyond the call of duty, but the dean simply asks him if he'll resign or if he needs to be fired. It's pitiful in the awkward way where we are made to understand his predicament even though he is clearly in the wrong. But it's awkward viewing because we know the director and we know he is using this introduction to lionize someone who might not entirely deserve it.

If you know the story at all, things get more familiar from here on out. After moving in with his mother, Richard gets a job working security for the Olympics in Atlanta. Once he alerts the authorities about a suspicious bag -- they initially mock him for being so pretentious, only to discover three pipe bombs inside -- he works hard and fast to make a perimeter before the explosion. His heroic action makes him the center of attention, and before he can go home he is swept up in the media spotlight, interviewed by Katie Couric herself. But as the FBI begin to investigate, he becomes their primary suspect. He certainly fits the psychological profile.

Despite Clint Eastwood's heavy-handed storytelling, which seems to only get more problematic as he continues pumping out movies, the film manages to keep its emotional manipulations in check by focusing so tightly on the relative uniqueness of its characters. Unlike the broad stereotyping in Sully, for example, a lot of the characters here are not really representative of their professions, and so they aren't really painted as "good guys" or "bad guys." Jon Hamm, for example, and Olivia Wilde are painted pretty clearly as the antagonists (FBI agent and media reporter, respectively), but their characters are a little too specific and too layered to represent their power structures. Wilde is especially fascinating in a sure-to-be criticized role as a desperate reporter who jumps to wild conclusions and exchanges sex for information.

But the movie belongs firmly to Paul Walter Hauser, Kathy Bates, and Sam Rockwell as Jewell, his mother, and their lawyer. The three of them play off each other beautifully, crafting a moving relationship that bends under each new blow by the media and the government without breaking. And while most artists in Trump's America are doing well to vindicate the free press, this film does the difficult -- and, thankfully, mostly tasteful -- job of showing what negative effects can happen when the news jumps to conclusions. Eastwood isn't lampooning the FBI or press here, though I was certain he would, and he does a fair job showing how irritating his main character can be and why he was, somewhat rightfully, suspected. But Eastwood seems more interested in showing how the tone of the news and the disdain of the investigators ruined Richard Jewell's life, along with the repulsive popular interest and mob mentality of the public who wanted him to fry.


Monday, January 21, 2019

On the Basis of Sex (2018)

Score: 4 / 5

There's really nothing special about On the Basis of Sex. It's a rote biopic depicting the early life of one Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who of course would go on to be iconic progressive voice in U.S. legal and judicial history. Shmaltzy and sentimental, the film capitalizes on its own senses of nostalgia and timeliness to lionize a woman who hardly needs any extra praise. Much like The Post last year, this feels like an awards grab -- though with considerably less technical skill -- for an audience who is already well-acquainted with its real-life counterpart.

There's really nothing special about the screenplay. We follow Ruth through Harvard Law School and her underdog status as a woman in the male-dominated program. We see her grin and bear it -- though not without her fiery brand of wit and scathing retorts -- and she buckles down to earn her own degree and help her husband. Later, they work together on a case that she's sure will topple "the whole damn system"...if, of course, they win. It's a classic tale of love and hard work and victory that feels nauseatingly like an origin story for a superhero. While there are stakes, we know every step of the journey before it appears on screen.

There's really nothing special about the performances. Felicity Jones brings her considerable talent to the fore -- she's really one of the best in her generation, in my opinion -- but she doesn't do much here we haven't seen her do before. Armie Hammer is his usual suave, intelligent, charming self, and while his supportive husband is a welcome sight (his character's position is usually a vile, chauvinistic sadist), he's not giving us much to chew on. Brief appearances by Sam Waterston as the primary villain and Kathy Bates as the revered mentor figure Dorothy Kenyon, while delightful, are nothing noteworthy.

There's really nothing special about the movie in general. But that's exactly why this movie works so well.

Nothing about it is larger than life. Its comfortable familiarity belies its strength of conviction and heart. It doesn't want to paint Ginsburg as a real person with dark sides and personal struggles, because it's too busy celebrating her magnificent achievements. It doesn't want to exhaust us with her lifelong story of heroic triumphs because it's too busy focusing on her landmark early win that launched her on her path to progress America into a new age of gender equality. It doesn't need all the technical skill to win awards because its simplicity and earnestness is more than enough to win hearts.

And check out Kesha's new song that plays during the closing credits. It's a gem.